Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$579
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 196
2-Core 388
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 757
8-Core 1,416
130% 1,087 Pts
64-Core 2,424
150% 2,424 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$668
Gigabyte(1458 40E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 361
Reflection 348
Parallax 371
294% 360 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 304
Splatting 218
262% 337 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,342
Write 2,508
Mixed 1,477
401% 1,776 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 7.4
131% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 1,317
713% 652 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 370%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 156
Mixed 82.2
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 91
MC Write 59.2
MC Mixed 51
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 47.7
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 54.5
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 179%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $1,064
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback