Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 16:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 335
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 380X
XFX(1682 9385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.6% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 63.6
39% 53.7 fps
MRender 48.7
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 34.8
35% 44.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB SSD 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 432 432 339 77 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 476
Write 448
Mixed 334
SusWrite 289
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 13.2
123% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 15.6
60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: 0001MBC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 87.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 104
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
81GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 87.4
Write 83.1
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 78.7
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 1319 KRE-D3U1600M/8G 10GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 32 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR025D V223HQV
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback