Today's hottest deals

MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 12:32
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 136
2-Core 276
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 771
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 126
Parallax 136
105% 130 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
115% 145 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 855 909 918 521 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 984
Write 909
Mixed 758
SusWrite 666
186% 829 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 53.8
202% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 398
362% 530 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 169%
Great: 203%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB
397GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 85 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 82.2
Write 75.9
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 83.7
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 64%
Adaptec Array 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 35 39 21 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 179
Write 43.8
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 32.2
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 90%
Adaptec Array 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 67 70 57 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 92.4
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 64.9
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 95%
Adaptec Array 499GB
406GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 64.3
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 54.6
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX KF3600C16D4/16GX 24GB
3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 37.5
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 34.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24.1" 1280 720 PHL08C8 Philips 240S4
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 2,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback