HP h9-1183

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h9-1183  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory3.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120314
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 04:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 468
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 66
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 65.4
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 414
Mixed 358
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 35.4
114% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 349
259% 342 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
2GB free
Firmware: 4PC10365
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 228
Write 126
Mixed 126
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 11.2
55% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 61.9
57% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$200
6GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 60 76 67 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 87.7
Write 88.6
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 69.7
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 34" 1280 720 HPN395A OMEN 34c
Typical h9-1183 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: HP h9-1183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $427
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback