Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Intel Jasper Lake Client Platform
Motherboard	Intel JSL MRD (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220913
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '23 at 01:17
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 41.3 1-Core 73 2-Core 143 47% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 244 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 4.9 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 256GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN12015 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 261 286 315 283 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 361 Write 282 Mixed 314 SusWrite 288 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 22.9 75% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 231 165% 209 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.8% Average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 16.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	52	0	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0DE5 SAMSUNG

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	400x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	87x
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	423x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	101x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 89 samples	90x
2x6GBSamsungBench 41%, 80 samples	78x
KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 512 samples	70x