Today's hottest deals

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory58.6 GB free of 64.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 21:49
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5410
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 70.4
35% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 106
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 2366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 347.25
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.2
7% 9.6 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 8.8
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 212 215 236 240 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 226
Write 226
Mixed 170
SusWrite 224
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 25.4
85% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 170
128% 172 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 117%
Seagate DL2400MM0159 2.5TB
114GB free
Firmware: ST5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 185 191 196 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
Read 179
Write 175
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 189
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 2.2
10% 4 MB/s
DQ Read 3.5
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 2.7
4% 6.1 MB/s
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 206
Write 30.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 29.7
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 97GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 13 60 32" 1280 720 MTK0030 Cultraview TV
Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback