Peladn WI-7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemPeladn WI-7  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 316
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0301 02F3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 7
Parallax 4.4
3% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTS430S 1TB
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22Z4V55Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 262 260 263 223 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 427
Write 393
Mixed 370
SusWrite 256
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 42.2
136% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 139
156% 265 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x3GB
4 of 8 slots used
12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28.4
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC21A PHL 272V8
Typical WI-7 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Peladn WI-7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback