Today's hottest deals

ONDA A520-VH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemONDA A520-VH  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda A520-VH
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 07:53
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$123
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 319
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 906
94% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Asus(1043 05D7) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 138
Parallax 288
117% 190 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 155
Splatting 208
164% 200 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Great Wall GW3300 512GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1006A5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,088
Write 1,716
Mixed 1,295
377% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 34.6
223% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 596
528% 789 MB/s
Poor: 181% Great: 278%
Lexar NM610PRO 1TB
740GB free
Firmware: 9442
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 688 676 686 686 686 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 716
Write 710
Mixed 672
SusWrite 687
157% 696 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 66.2
227% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 975
656% 793 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 172%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 24.5" 1280 720 AOCB315 25G3Z
Typical A520-VH Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: ONDA A520-VH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback