Asus X510UNR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X510UNR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UNR
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 93
2-Core 137
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 286
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 163E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7
4% 6.23 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 132
Mixed 178
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 26.3
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 162
140% 213 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
160GB free
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 142 45 25 161 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 374
Write 295
Mixed 200
SusWrite 129
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 13.3
42% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 29.8
39% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905712-010.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical X510UNR Builds (Compare 817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UNR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback