Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 07:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 169
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 306
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 776MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14376
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 343 324 336 329 340 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 443
Write 360
Mixed 380
SusWrite 338
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 135
116% 164 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 29 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2964 HP LE2002x
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback