Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R1
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170112
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 66.6
32% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 122
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 25.4
22% 28.6 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 19.8
22% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 512GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 1135 1226 1307 1385 1379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1394
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 1,248
296% 1,313 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 28.9
102% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 110
117% 197 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 172%
Great: 317%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 127 130 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 110
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
112% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 15.5" 1920 1080 LGD0533
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback