Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory17.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 17.6GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.2 GB free of 17.5781 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-13600K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 202
2-Core 416
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,411
134% 1,111 Pts
64-Core 2,122
131% 2,122 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 111
Parallax 147
127% 138 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
106% 135 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,608
Write 3,300
Mixed 3,892
2,964% 3,933 MB/s
4K Read 87.3
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 81.6
14,341% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 228
2,082% 226 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
541GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1537 1423 1505 1331 1513 1464 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 17GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 1616 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 40.4
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 35.3
105% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 116%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 24.5" 2048 1081 BNQ7F52 High Rate240
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback