Today's hottest deals

Adreamer LeoBook 16S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAdreamer LeoBook 16S  (all builds)
MotherboardAdreamer LeoBook 16S
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 66.2
1-Core 177
2-Core 307
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 836
86% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,207
75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C A10F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 20.9
15% 20.2 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 16
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F001T 1TB
915GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1294 1013 1353 1344 1459 1449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1456
Write 1,550
Mixed 1,273
SusWrite 1,318
316% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 57.9
215% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 134
240% 490 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 234%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200CQGZZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 16" 1280 720 CSO160E
Typical LeoBook 16S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Adreamer LeoBook 16S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback