GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive504% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 57.8
1-Core 198
2-Core 383
108% 213 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 1,069
107% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1E50 8018) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 59.1
29% 39.5 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 62.9
39% 45.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE980Y38900-2TB 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10191
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3768 3765 3749 3323 1350 1484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
504% Outstanding
Read 4,160
Write 4,349
Mixed 3,335
SusWrite 2,906
830% 3,688 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 91.8
313% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,621
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,275
992% 1,371 MB/s
Poor: 290%
This bench: 504%
Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h 7500 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 61.2
MC Mixed 50.9
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 39.8
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 48.8
133% 46.7 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 141%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 10.1" 2048 1280 JDI0031 GPD1001H
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 241% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback