Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 138
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 192
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 95.7
Parallax 93.6
77% 94.6 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 88.4
Splatting 75.6
70% 87.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 80 80 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 217
Write 112
Mixed 160
SusWrite 85.9
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 20.4
70% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 87.5
66% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 0 32" 1280 720 KTC2204 22T41-H-AN
Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback