Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 15:05
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 648
70% 559 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 110
Parallax 126
99% 119 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 113
Splatting 102
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 178 204 203 199 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 343
Write 294
Mixed 248
SusWrite 184
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 21.2
95% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 35.5
76% 154 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 90%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
53GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 293 344 352 343 354 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 350
Write 309
Mixed 300
SusWrite 318
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 33.9
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 275
228% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
137GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 264 331 340 326 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 242
Write 317
Mixed 238
SusWrite 303
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 41.8
141% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 162
173% 289 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D48G8G8H8US9AFRB19 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 29.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 28.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 28" 1280 720 OOO0001 28' monitor
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback