Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 358%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics311% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive567% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory248.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 19:07
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w5-3435X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 60
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
91% 176 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,222
109% 921 Pts
64-Core 3,002
186% 3,002 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
311% Outstanding
Lighting 473
Reflection 498
Parallax 560
385% 510 fps
MRender 464
Gravity 489
Splatting 270
320% 408 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 311%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4787 4851 4867 5046 5062 5081 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
567% Outstanding
Read 2604
Write 4,819
Mixed 3,168
SusWrite 4949
885% 3,885 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 111
334% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,188
904% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 567%
Great: 634%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4552 5063 5070 5070 5081 5105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
574% Outstanding
Read 2,649
Write 4,788
Mixed 3,188
SusWrite 4990
889% 3,904 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 112
338% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1277
953% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 574%
Great: 634%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
13TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 598 317 312 319 314 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$270
3.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 400 434 434 431 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 380
Write 464
Mixed 380
SusWrite 419
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 49
163% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 139
159% 273 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$270
3.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 396 434 434 432 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 456
Mixed 383
SusWrite 418
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 49.5
164% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 140
160% 273 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Crucial MX500 4TB-$270
3.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 402 435 435 433 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 461
Mixed 377
SusWrite 419
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 139
159% 273 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC40F2046S1RC48BA1 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4812 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
234% Outstanding
MC Read 108
MC Write 101
MC Mixed 88.8
284% 99.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 252%
This bench: 234%
Great: 378%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 SKG3212 Q3212RUC
Typical Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 429%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $2,077
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback