Today's hottest deals

Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 17:47
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$143
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 204
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 565
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6181) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 139
Parallax 129
104% 132 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 131
Splatting 115
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 415 418 432 433 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 375
Write 361
Mixed 286
SusWrite 426
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 30.8
113% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 158
138% 198 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 105%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 148 153 154 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 160
Write 144
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 151
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 JPVT-16A1YT0 1TB
119GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 58
Write 25.6
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 40.4
47% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5BB2 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback