| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '23 at 14:03 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.2%
Above average
|
64% 112 Pts
|
35% 261 Pts
|
16% 252 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
23% 36.6 fps
|
27% 34.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 120 118 122 133 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
90% 124 MB/s
|
150% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD CT8G4DFRA266.C8FP 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
90% 31.5 GB/s
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | PHLC0CF PHL 223V5 |
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,003 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 556x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 497x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 409x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $144Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 324x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 237x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 235x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $264 |