Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF114-34

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAcer Swift SF114-34  (all builds)
MotherboardJSL Labatt_JL
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Memory 2.63
1-Core 6.8
2-Core 17.8
4% 9.08 Pts
4-Core 30.1
8-Core 43.6
5% 36.8 Pts
64-Core 47.4
3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1516) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1014 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 98 100 91 115 97 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 341
Write 131
Mixed 176
SusWrite 104
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 8.3
27% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.8
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 62.6
52% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 32%
Great: 184%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5 4.7 4 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 5.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 5
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung U6E3S4AA-MGCR 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 2,595
2% 2,595 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 3 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical Swift SF114-34 Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF114-34

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback