Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
System
MotherboardSAPPHIRE Pure Platinum Z77K
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 316
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 72.6
62% 75 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 59.2
53% 65 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 411 439 463 464 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 370
Write 377
Mixed 332
SusWrite 406
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 28.6
105% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 195
174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
413GB free
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 401 423 445 446 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 430
Write 337
Mixed 362
SusWrite 391
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 23.3
102% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 116
136% 231 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17" 1280 720 GSM4B46 L1953T
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback