Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory37.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$156
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 165
2-Core 306
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 947
93% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 128
Parallax 132
116% 134 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 110
Splatting 95
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 855 785 696 652 586 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,685
Mixed 1,310
SusWrite 803
299% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 66.4
236% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,172
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 982
740% 998 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 227%
Great: 276%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
936GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 36.5
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 104%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 39.1
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1920 1009 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback