Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardQIYIDA ED4
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230404
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 06:53
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 147
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 517
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Zotac(19DA 5379) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 29.4
26% 35.9 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 27.8
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 120 125 121 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 140
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 120
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 8GB 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 214 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0512 K222HQL
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback