Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 219
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 743
68% 569 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 74
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 71.9
60% 73.4 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 57.8
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 676
Write 740
Mixed 652
154% 689 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 45.8
156% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 497
416% 603 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK Samsung M378A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 16.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 9G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 34% 56 217 60 60 61.7" 1366 768 ELE6308 ELSW3917C
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback