Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80T3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80T3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 23:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 131
58% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 177
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L2 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21L1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 399
Write 377
Mixed 262
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 37.6
117% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 296
231% 317 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
392GB free
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 86 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 71.2
Write 77.2
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 86.5
48% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Z-2G3B1 1B Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D5
Typical 80T3 Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback