Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory43.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 03:55
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 971
86% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,959
121% 1,959 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1710 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.44.07
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 57
Parallax 81.2
53% 67.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 41.6
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,540
Write 1,829
Mixed 932
320% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 57.6
214% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 404
358% 557 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
131% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 66.9
MC Mixed 47.4
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 129%
This bench: 131%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 214 60 60 23" 1280 720 ACR03DF G237HL
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback