HP p7-1439

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1439  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 07:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 97.5
49% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 120
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
PNY(196E 1117) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.17 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 319 296 312 331 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68% Good
Read 326
Write 292
Mixed 210
SusWrite 311
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 27.2
92% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 135
110% 155 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 29% 17 87 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN343E HP VH24
Typical p7-1439 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback