Today's hottest deals

Asus X550VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VC
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 108
43% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 172
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13035
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 340 370 340 370 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 334
Write 344
Mixed 355
SusWrite 365
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 23.5
89% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 192
145% 190 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 28 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO46EC
Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback