Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 22:18
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 195
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 404
49% 374 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Gigabyte(1458 22B2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR256G-101IL 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 176 29 31 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 312
Write 328
Mixed 228
SusWrite 109
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 27.3
94% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 184
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 17% 88 99 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback