MSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 11:51
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 806
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 130
Parallax 167
69% 127 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 149
117% 143 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 121 141 65 26 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 298
Mixed 157
SusWrite 103
130% 609 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 42.9
150% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 119
159% 291 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 144%
Great: 290%
SSD 240GB
116GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 409
Write 237
Mixed 295
69% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 14.6
66% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 22.2
28% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
WDC WDS100T2B0B 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,391
Write 47
Mixed 87.8
314% 1,509 MB/s
4K Read 595
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4.4
909% 201 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
343GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 73
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
626GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5561
Write 14.8
Mixed 19
1,333% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 581
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.7
24,398% 194 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
68GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.7
Write 80.5
Mixed 61.5
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Asmt 2105 750GB
629GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 2 3.1 3.3 2.9 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 65%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 16GB
15GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26
Write 9.2
Mixed 4.2
13% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
699GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 18 26 21 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 50
Write 33
Mixed 18
SusWrite 19.7
37% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
23% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 27.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 21 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Typical B560M PRO (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 1,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback