Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 23:36
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GLP-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 221
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 312
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 292
Parallax 325
228% 299 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 260
Splatting 190
208% 264 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 197%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 127GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 122 126 125 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 311
Write 221
Mixed 185
SusWrite 121
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 9.7
39% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 56.8
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 43.8
34% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 119 123 120 115 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.9% Very poor
Read 96.3
Write 142
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 119
25% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 3.7
14% 5.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 12.3
9% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid Array 2 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 123 120 125 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 202
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 119
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
222% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 0P 5R 7G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 16% 101 207 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback