Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1439

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1439  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 98.1
42% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 168
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Zotac(19DA 9231) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 385 353 286 293 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 372
Mixed 403
SusWrite 332
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 44.6
147% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 252
190% 255 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 127 125 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 126
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F CT51264BD160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 33% 18 45 33 60 23.8" 1920 1017 HPN343E HP VH24
Typical p7-1439 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback