HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory12.9 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 09:08
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 160
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 344
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Gigabyte(1458 2403) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 0
31% 33.4 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 26.6
42% 55.7 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S600 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC0810H1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 9.7 0 0.8 6.8 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Poor
Read 189
Write 88.5
Mixed 115
SusWrite 23.2
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 0
40% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 2.6
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20%
Great: 79%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
200GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 214 212 195 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.6% Above average
Read 168
Write 242
Mixed 238
SusWrite 205
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 34.5
104% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 196
139% 176 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 128%
GB1000EAMYC 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: HPG2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 9,008
Mixed 88.6
3,254% 4,548 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3393 HP 24ea
Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback