Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$185
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 410
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 76
Parallax 69.8
58% 72.2 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 68.5
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,131
Write 992
Mixed 821
218% 981 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 58.9
187% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 514
492% 779 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
167GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 362
Mixed 313
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 46.3
156% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
552GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 187 189 191 195 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 127
Write 137
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 187
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 12.2
Mixed 21
51% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2C3000C16 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2C3000C16 16GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 33
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 23.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 33% 3 198 29 144 24" 1920 1080 VSC1B35 XG2402 SERIES
Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback