Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 197
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 356
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 57
Parallax 72.2
42% 60.3 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 42.7
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 330
Write 111
Mixed 178
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 22
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 111
93% 136 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 104
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 9% 11 197 58 60 31.5" 2560 1440 GBT2800 M28U
Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback