Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 13:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 129
46% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 264
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 37.8
9% 32.6 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 39.2
31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 788
Write 855
Mixed 751
179% 798 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 31.1
102% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 543
397% 515 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback