QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 21 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 131 48% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 456 46% 376 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Dell(1028 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.86 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 30 Parallax 27.1 21% 27.5 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 28.9 22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 886GB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 1427 1408 1469 1571 1595 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,233 Write 1,602 Mixed 1,408 SusWrite 1,474 324% 1,429 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 27.8 87% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 262 190% 247 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 394%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 2x16GB 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 13.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 231%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	58	60	24.1"	1280 720	SAM0CC1 S24E650

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406