Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T7 V20.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.4
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime25.7 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 10:02
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 73.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,081
100% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1146) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 130
Parallax 124
107% 128 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.2
87% 110 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 138 127 134 150 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,708
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,564
SusWrite 231
376% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 105
363% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 1,277
DQ Mixed 561
571% 910 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 283%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2F1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0823
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.4 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback