Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 00:00
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,105
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 2,131
132% 2,131 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3985) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 140
Parallax 291
120% 193 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 156
Splatting 212
170% 209 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
309GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1923 1941 1954 1935 1547 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,347
Write 2,425
Mixed 2,265
SusWrite 1,887
503% 2,231 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 77
274% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,108
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,001
751% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 338%
Great: 435%
SHGP31-500GM-2 500GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41060C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,550
Write 2,320
Mixed 1,740
490% 2,203 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 84.7
276% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 931
698% 933 MB/s
Poor: 186% Great: 376%
Jajs600m 2TB 2TB
360GB free
Firmware: T112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 398 399 404 408 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 474
Write 399
Mixed 385
SusWrite 385
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 26.4
105% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 49.6
65% 115 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 126 123 120 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 99.7
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 124
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 24.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 34" 1280 720 NXG0052 NX-EDG34
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback