Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 23:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 226
68% 128 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 334
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.52.04
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 21.3
12% 16.9 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 13.7
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 395 382 373 370 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 464
Mixed 375
SusWrite 387
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 47.2
162% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 250
215% 318 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23" 1920 1080 DELF033 DELL ST2321L
Typical Desktop M01-F0xxx Builds (Compare 629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback