Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81JM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 23:38
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 71
43% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 206
33% 236 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.43 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 50 55 55 54 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 260
Write 173
Mixed 128
SusWrite 73.3
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 9.9
33% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 8.6
20% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HT-Micron HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD LENOVO TMA851S6AFR6N-UHHC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 23% 26 100 58 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical 81JM Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback