PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161107 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '23 at 12:24 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
57.4%
Above average
|
51% 79.4 Pts
|
30% 241 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.4%
Above average
|
55% 66.8 fps
|
54% 65.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 159 146 145 125 134 MB/s
|
66.5%
Good
|
59% 266 MB/s
|
101% 35.8 MB/s
|
128% 186 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
499GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 156 155 154 154 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
113% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.7%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
28% 9.73 GB/s
|
50% 80.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23% | 16% | 57 | 216 | 60 | 120 | 24" | 1920 1080 | BNQ7F06 BenQ XL2420T |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 434x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |