Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 12:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 104
51% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 291
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 64.1
55% 66.8 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 64.8
54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 159 146 145 125 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 413
Write 195
Mixed 301
SusWrite 155
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 29.3
101% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 148
128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
499GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 156 155 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 152
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 16% 57 216 60 120 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F06 BenQ XL2420T
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback