Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 10:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 530
63% 487 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Zotac(19DA 2440) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 61.5
53% 75.2 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 66
Splatting 61.4
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 264
Mixed 240
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 33.4
122% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 236
198% 290 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 185
Mixed 90
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.7
Write 9.8
Mixed 12.8
21% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 6% 77 217 60 60 19" 1280 720 SAM0454 SyncMaster
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback