Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 325
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 1,136
105% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,724
107% 1,724 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 157
Parallax 163
133% 161 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 148
Splatting 132
119% 148 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 123%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 475 459 454 441 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 505
300% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.7
228% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,064
801% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 221%
Great: 296%
SDLFAE3R-120G-1HA1 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: PRO6F519
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 123 125 117 163 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 337
Write 152
Mixed 179
SusWrite 134
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 20.1
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 118
103% 155 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 67%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EDFMF0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1732 1260 37 38 42 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 892
Write 1,677
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 524
234% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.4
182% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,039
774% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 169%
Great: 556%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
441GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 79 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 87.3
Write 97.9
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 77.9
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
565GB free
Firmware: CC9B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 145 148 136 150 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 76.8
Write 90.9
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 145
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$86
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 33.6
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 32.1
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 6 165 34.2" 3440 1440 DELA212 AW3423DWF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback