Acer Aspire E1-410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E1-410
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2920
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 17.6
2-Core 34.3
20% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 41
8-Core 51.8
6% 46.4 Pts
64-Core 50.7
3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 083D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.9
Write 51.4
Mixed 27.9
24% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
14GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.7
Write 18.7
Mixed 22
29% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
119% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC2P1-B1FS 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.4
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 8 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1493
Typical Aspire E1-410 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback