Acer Veriton M200-H410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-H410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H410H6-M17
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 13:07
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 725
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Elitegroup(1019 A705) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 42 100 140 147 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 152
Write 120
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 112
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
532GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 36.3
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 41
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE400UD51208-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0757 EK220Q
Typical Veriton M200-H410 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-H410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback