Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 86
2-Core 174
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 432
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Asus(1043 8655) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 64.7
51% 65.4 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 64
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 179
Mixed 218
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 15.2
92% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 29.5
45% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
100GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70% Very good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 116
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-562.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 35" 3440 1440 SPT0DB7 Sceptre C35
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback