Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel D54250WYK
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 14:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4250U-$499
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 58
2-Core 103
47% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 148
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.9
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 225 281 292 305 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 441
Write 412
Mixed 323
SusWrite 284
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 39.4
125% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 312
238% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 9905428-417.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 15.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D37 C27F591
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback