Razer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive476% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA770
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 09:53
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 164
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 606
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3004) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3285 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 209
Parallax 198
156% 200 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 149
Splatting 124
121% 151 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 136%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S880 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3187 3338 3397 3558 3599 3563 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 3605
Write 3,871
Mixed 2831
SusWrite 3,440
775% 3,437 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 88.7
293% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 660
499% 672 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 476%
Great: 625%
Fanxiang S880 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3709 3621 3646 3648 3666 3564 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
491% Outstanding
Read 3,587
Write 3,913
Mixed 2,988
SusWrite 3,642
797% 3,533 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 91.2
301% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 717
532% 708 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 491%
Great: 625%
External USB3.0 DISK02 500GB
258GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 120
Write 127
Mixed 71
SusWrite 128
151% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 34.1
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 11.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 18% 17 46 30 0 72.3" 1280 720 SEK3393 SE43FS
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 11: 0P 1R 2G 0B
Typical Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406 Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 17 (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0406

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback