Lenovo 81W1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 13:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 69.1
36% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 71.1
8-Core 78.4
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 80.7
5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.4
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 608
Write 428
Mixed 516
115% 517 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 17.8
56% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 60.4
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 53.8
41% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMSA3310MR86H9F-3200 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 5.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 15.5" 1536 793 LGD05E5
Typical 81W1 Builds (Compare 1,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback